September 01, 2005

Do You Really Want to!

Today the Department of Constitutional Affairs has issued another consultation paper. It’s entitled, “Hearing the relatives of murder and manslaughter victims” Hidden amongst its thirty odd pages is this:
64. If a right is introduced for relatives of murder and manslaughter victims to make an oral statement to the judge, the defence might wish advance notice and the right to challenge this statement and to cross-examine the relative where the facts in the statement have a bearing on the sentence and are in dispute. The Government believes that the trial judge would be best placed to decide the rare cases in which this might be necessary to ensure the defendant’s right to a fair trial is not compromised. A victim’s advocate would also be in a good position to assist the relative to make their statement in a way which would avoid such circumstances arising. But we would welcome views on this point and on the practical implications in terms of advance notice.
You’re damned right most competent defence counsel will want, not only to have advanced disclosure of what “evidence” will be given, but also to ensure the oral evidence given is challenged. Should this proposal be adopted, it could result in an increased sentence for the offender, and it’s important for his representative to ensure that the victim's advocate is not tempted to embellish the evidence. I wonder whether victims or their advocates will still be keen on making an oral statement if they know that it would be subject to challenge?

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home